Independent Medical Examinations
Melissa Blevins, Demosthenes Lorandos & Marc Harding
Because of their prevalence in civil practice and workers’ compensation disputes, Independent Medical Examinations (IMEs) can be bane or blessing, depending on the quality of the IME and which side of the dispute you’re on. When properly done, IMEs provide an objective assessment of medical injuries–from diagnosis and causation to impairment rating, apportionment and treatment–and ultimately contribute to a fair adjudication of the dispute. And when poorly performed, the IME at best muddies the waters and, at worst, can produce an unjust result.
This chapter comprehensively addresses IMEs from a legal perspective, providing invaluable insight to litigators and examiners alike, with detailed guidance and discussion of the full range of potential issues, including:
Elements of a Proper IME Exam
Special Guidance for Subjective Complaint Assessment
Sample Direct Examination Voir Dire to Qualify an IME
Guidance for General, Neuropsychological & Functional Assessments
Guidance for Conducting the Examination
Discussion of the Nature of the Physician - Patient Relationship
Elements of a Proper IME Report
Guidance for Completing the Assessment
Guidance for Preparing for and Providing Expert Testimony
Guidance for Interviewing & History Taking
Discussion of Potential Conflicts of Interest and Malpractice Lawsuits
Examiner Qualifications & Conduct
Overview of Discovery Procedures to Compel an IME
Sample Cross-Examination Voir Dire to Disqualify a Proffered IME